The Cohn–Elkies exponent and sign uncertainty

6. Comparison of the sign-uncertainty constants🔗

This chapter follows Appendix A of the report. Proposition A.1 is formalized in L^1 generality (modules CohnElkies.SignUncertainty.MellinCancellation, CohnElkies.SignUncertainty.TailIntegral, CohnElkies.SignUncertainty.AppendixA). The appendix's conclusion \mathsf{A}_+(d) < \mathsf{A}_-(d) needs, in addition, an extremizer attaining \mathsf{A}_-(d) (Cohn–Gonçalves 2019, Theorem 1.4), whose proof is not part of the report. The second half of the chapter formalizes that existence theorem, following Cohn–Gonçalves (§3.2): the origin correction of their Lemma 3.1, the positivity and finiteness of the constants in every dimension, weak sequential compactness in L^2, and — in place of the quantitative uncertainty principle of Nazarov and Jaming they invoke — a qualitative "no concentration" lemma for eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform, proved by compactness (modules CohnElkies.SignUncertainty.OriginCorrection, CohnElkies.SignUncertainty.Finiteness, CohnElkies.SignUncertainty.AppendixA, CohnElkiesForMathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.WeakSequentialCompactness, CohnElkiesForMathlib.Analysis.Fourier.EigenfunctionConcentration). The nodes depend on the definitions of the introduction and on the radial reduction of the preliminaries.

  1. 6.1. Proposition A.1: the tail-integration operator
  2. 6.2. Existence of extremizers